Search for: "LL v. Medical Protective Co." Results 181 - 200 of 306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Jensen, 534 N.W.2d 361, 368 (Wis. 1995) ("the physician-patient privilege did not protect communications relevant to or within the scope of discovery"); Stigliano v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 26, Oct. 6 and Oct. 13 conferences) E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:13 am by Josh Wright
Judge Saris’s district court opinion denying the motion to exclude one of the plaintiff’s economic experts in  Natchitoches Parish Hospital v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am by Camilla Hrdy
  I agreed, and in 2021 I co-wrote a number of pieces advocating that HHS and the White House explore every legal pathway at their disposal. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), came down, we were relieved and grateful. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Bexis
Furthermore, because these guidelines are intended to be protective of all individuals [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serve as co-counsel to the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
We've substituted "[information]" for "medical journal articles and medical or scientific reference publications" - the language that the FDA uses in the Guidance. [read post]