Search for: "Light City, LLC"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm
In 2011’s AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The filing was in response to and shed more light on a lawsuit Trump filed seeking to block the disclosure of records related to his whereabouts, communications, and activities that day. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 10:11 am
Additionally, brokerage firms are required to ensure that all investment recommendations made are suitable in light of the client’s age, investment experience, investment objectives, net worth, and income. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:59 am
Additionally, brokerage firms are required to ensure that all investment recommendations made are suitable in light of the client’s age, investment experience, investment objectives, net worth, and income. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
A claim of liability for a violation of this duty may sound in either contract or tort (see Broecker v Conklin Prop., LLC, 189 AD3d 751, 753; Gagliardi v Preferred Mut. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 3:54 pm
Knispel, LLC. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
(relisted after the Sept. 27, Oct. 8 and Oct. 15 conferences) Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Those allegations do not suggest a reasonable possibility of coverage in light of the relevant contractor’s exception, which excluded coverage for claims premised on personal injury sustained by an employee of an independent contractor while working on behalf of an insured, or on the job site but not working for an insured (see generally City of New York v Wausau Underwriters Ins. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm
City of San Jose (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1325, 1345 [my 11/12/13 post on which can be found here]; Clews Land & Livestock, LLC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
In several major cities and counties, in some territories, perhaps in the whole state of California, and to a small extent in Minnesota, private businesses may not discriminate against patrons based on certain of their political activities. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus,… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus,… [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:58 pm
by Dennis Crouch Infernal Tech LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
When the attorney asked for more information on the nature of the dispute, they received an email from “Buvant Construction Group LLC” stating that the dispute was with “Fastenal Company, United States” concerning an unfulfilled order. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
City of Philadephia last term, but decided it was unnecessary to resolve and left the question for another day. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:11 am
LLC over the supply of reactor coolant pumps for nuclear power plants in China. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
In addition to the federal sector, New York City recently announced that city workers must be vaccinated or tested weekly starting September 13. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:30 am
In Wasa Props., LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 12:49 pm
When the attorney asked for more information on the nature of the dispute, they received an email from “Buvant Construction Group LLC” stating that the dispute was with “Fastenal Company, United States” concerning an unfulfilled order. [read post]
