Search for: "Livings v. Davis" Results 181 - 200 of 1,226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:30 am by Gene Takagi
Supreme Court has misleading opponents and potentially huge impact – we weigh in on the side of transparency & prosecution of bad actors: CalNonprofitsGene: Americans for Prosperity v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In one action last Monday, the Court denied the request for review (known as a petition for a writ of certiorari) in the case filed by the Pennsylvania Republican Party (Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
US may apply unclean hands: Villa v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Herb Lin, Amy Zegart
Rodney Davis, John Katko), and James Comer have introduced a bill that would establish a national bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The Law of Facebook, UC Davis Law Review, Forthcoming, Ashutosh Avinash Bhagwat, University of California, Davis – School of Law. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
You could ask about anything with the debates being quite lively. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
Harris, University of California, Davis School of Law Rather than silo disability or limit conversations about disability to the antidiscrimination realm, we ought to deploy disability as a critical lens across areas of law. [read post]
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm by Gene Takagi
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:08 pm by Jeanne Huang
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Schlunk decided by the Supreme Court of the US and Segers and Rufa BV v. [read post]