Search for: "Long v. Davis" Results 181 - 200 of 2,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2022, 3:50 am by Tom Sharbaugh
  Historically, there have long been several seniority-based “lockstep” firms that, by dint of their high profits, have been able to ignore the topic of partner origination. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The texts are long and often dense; the analysis is complex, sometimes tedious; the assertions and conclusions frequently come with qualifications; and the bottom lines are usually nuanced.Done right, law school—and the practice of law thereafter—is hard work, and plenty of it. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 10:38 am
This one catches the eye at the outset because the caption lists the case as "Reno v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Under Title VII, religious objectors can get exemptions from generally applicable work rules, but only so long as the exceptions don't create an "undue hardship" to the employer, which is to say so long as they impose only "de minimis costs. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:08 am by Scott Hervey
It’s been a long-standing practice. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In 1889 SCOTUS defined religion in Davis v Beason, making reference to Madison, as follows: ‘The term “religion” has reference to one's views of his relations to his Creator, and to the obligations they impose of reverence for his being and character, and of obedience to his will’. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
But it is an open question whether the transferor might still be secondarily liable (see, eg, Paul S Davies Accessory Liability (Hart Publishing, 2017) chapter 6). [read post]