Search for: "Lowe v. State Bar" Results 181 - 200 of 2,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) recently answered this question on January 2, 2014, in the case of Blast Blow Dry Bar LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am by Leiza Dolghih
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
Traditionally, the states set the bar to recovery in a defamation lawsuit exceedingly low. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:10 am by Amy Howe
Nonprofits that are licensed to provide medical services (such as pregnancy tests and ultrasound examinations) must post notices to inform their patients that free or low-cost abortions are available and provide the telephone number of the state agency that can put the patients in touch with providers of those abortions. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:09 am by Ray Mullman
About DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar is an international organization of defense attorneys and corporate counsel that is recognized as a thought-leader and an advocate for the defense bar at the national and state level as well as in Europe. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Thus, the statute of limitations barred the state law claims. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 837 F.3d 918, 932 (8th Cir. 2016) (finding viable FDCPA claims based on amounts "misstated by $1.29, $1.84, and $0.65" because "there [i]s no de minimis exception to FDCPA liability based upon low dollar amounts").[4]FULL TEXT OF DISSENTING OPINION  STEPHEN A. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am by Leisha Bond, St Philips
As stated in North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 he ‘is not an insurer against all hazards’. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:36 am
Two years ago, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dealt the government a stinging defeat in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
So the bar is low, but it's also high, because plausibility may be in the eye of the beholder. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 2:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
" But a First Amendment claim against a church and a priest cannot meet that low bar. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:25 am by Lindsay Colvin Stone
” Analyzing Hardison and the language of Title VII, the Court determined that the “de minimis cost” test was an erroneous interpretation of Hardison’s holding, and set the bar too low. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
She admitted making the agreement with Lowe's Home Improvement, stated that Lowe's "third partied" the agreement with GE Capital, and denied the amounts due and owing. [read post]