Search for: "MATTER OF D T K J D M" Results 181 - 200 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
“[D]isciplinary rules governing the legal profession cannot punish activity protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Kappos (SCt 08-964) Anyone with a lick of sense knew that Bilski wasn't going to get his patent claims granted. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
However, the Court of Appeal decided that a) the matter was of wider public interest and b) given that the appellant’s current AST was shortly to end, there was a [surely slim] possibility that Enfield would find that the chain of causation hadn’t been broken and that the appellant and his wife remained intentionally homeless, as per their review decision under appeal. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
–––Jasmine D.], 165 A.D.3d 476, 85 N.Y.S.3d 430 [1st Dept. 2018]). [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Children’s data protection rights: a data protection casualty? [read post]
16 May 2018, 8:10 am by Tim Sitzmann
But what if this isn’t just a regular beaver? [read post]