Search for: "MERRELL" Results 181 - 200 of 601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2007, 6:33 am
There was no set prohibition, rather "the Supreme Court has made it clear that each case involving an alleged violation of the FDCA must be reviewed to determine whether it should be distinguished on its facts from those in Grable and Merrell Dow. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
“Then time will tell just who fellAnd who’s been left behind”                   Dylan, “Most Likely You Go Your Way” (1966)   When the Daubert case headed to the Supreme Court, it had 22 amicus briefs in tow. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 7:22 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals and other federal court decisions provide persuasive authority in determining whether expert testimony should be admitted in Nevada courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:09 am by Alex Craigie
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (509 U.S. 579), federal courts have applied a different standard. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:08 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 [1993]) to determine whether expert scientific testimony is admissible. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:03 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 764 A.2d 1, 4 (Pa. 2000). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:00 am by David M. Boertje
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993), detailed how courts deal with polygraph tests as scientific evidence, since neither the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"The record demonstrates that plaintiff's proposed expert would not have been allowed to testify at the federal court trial in which plaintiff sought damages resulting from a breast implant rupture allegedly causing her to suffer systemic tissue disease and/or other autoimmune/rheumatic conditions, regardless of any negligence on the part of defendants in failing to produce the proposed expert for depositions, since his testimony on the issue of causation would not have survived a hearing… [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 11:56 am by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
  Jim Merrell, advocacy director of the Active Transportation Alliance, said these numbers represent “a step backward for safety in the city. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:19 am by Bexis
  He didn't file suit, however, until June 2009.Dead to rights under the Texas two-year statute of limitations, plaintiff tried to argue that his claim didn't "accrue" until there was scientific evidence sufficient to satisfy Texas' version of Daubert, which was imposed in Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]