Search for: "Mark B Rogers"
Results 181 - 200
of 431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm
Admiral Harry B. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
Roger Atwood's Stealing History tells some of their stories.#2 State prosecutions Matthew Bogdanos, a prosecutor at the New York County District Attorney’s Office, is pioneering efforts to apply state law to cultural property crimes. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
For the NLRB, see, for example, Mark H. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
The first prong of the Rogers test requires a showing that the use of a mark has artistic relevance to the underlying work. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:43 pm
Rogers simply requires that the junior user didn’t arbitrarily choose to use the mark just to exploit its publicity value. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 12:10 am
Clark, Treaty crimes Benjamin B. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
, Lawrence Herman, Trans-Pacific Trade and the Intellectual Property Challenge Mark Summerfield, Patents and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 9:04 pm
b.) [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am
Things I learned by doing the reading for this discussion: From the law reviews: Edward Rogers, primary drafter of Lanham Act: 1909 article. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though… [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
I’m also a fan of Rogers v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Less problem w/identifying a claimant to the mark, usually, b/c of public use requirement. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:15 pm
The annual B. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 4:54 pm
B. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
Just b/c it’s in the Lanham Act doesn’t make it foundational. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm
Sacks and Rachel B. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:03 am
In fact B&P do conclude that enforcement depends on the facts. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Consumer is less a delimiter in US scholarship than the licensor of expansion, b/c consumer perception is malleable when you have good counsel. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:02 pm
Roger Williams MP told the House of Commons: ‘Not only was Sid Fillery among those officers, but he played a key role in the initial murder inquiry during the first four so-called golden days before he was required to withdraw from the murder squad for reasons of personal involvement with the primary suspect, Jonathan Rees. [read post]
