Search for: "Mark Fish v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 456
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
Millions of millennia ago, in our own Milky Way galaxy, but far upstream of where we are today, two neutron stars spiraled around each other, each embodying the mass of a sun but smaller and faster than a speeding planet. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 12:32 am by Aneesa Bodiat
The exemption states that: ‘The protection of the overtime law does not apply to: The canning, processing, preserving, freezing, drying, marketing, storing, packing for shipment or distribution of:  (1) Agricultural produce;  (2) Meat and fish products; and  (3) Perishable foods. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:13 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
And when lists go on—as a Maine dairy company recently learned the hard way in O’Connor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
But sometimes the absence of the Oxford comma can make a difference in meaning.Recently, in O’Connor et al v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:42 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer also relied on the convention of using a conjunction to mark off the last item on a list. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
 Master Clark considered the authorities including HHJ Hacon's interpretation of the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Ltd [2015] UKSC 10: "I interpret this to mean that in order to fix an alleged joint tortfeasor with liability, it must be shown both that he actively co-operated to bring about the act of the primary tortfeasor and also that he intended that his co-operation would help to bring about that act (the act found to be tortious). [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
In an effort to identify the offenders, the photographs were posted online in various hunting and fishing forums and on Facebook. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm by familoo
I ploughed through to the end, like someone fishing through a bowl of pistachio shells hoping to find one last nut. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:04 pm by Donald Clarke
It’s like saying that the Supreme Court could have avoided ruling on the constitutionality of segregation by simply declining to hear Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm by Howard Knopf
This volume alone could justify a marked increase in current resources.Note the Board’s careful new use of the term “tariff units” – in contrast with what it has always called simply “tariffs”. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Justice Moore-Brick stated he found it unlikely that the grant would not have intended to extend to the low water mark on those occasions where the water falls below the mean law-water mark. [read post]