Search for: "Mark Smith v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 2:30 pm
Knotts and United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
The first is Murphy v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
MGFB Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:43 pm
On January 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in two cases—Relentless v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Brad Biddle, Arizona State University College of Law (with Jorge Contreras & Vigdis Bronder) Certification (and) Marks – Understanding Usage and Practices Among Standards Organizations Some mismatch in definition of “certification” marks—some organizations deliberately avoid that term. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:24 am
Supreme Court decision Smith v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:57 am
United States, 536 U.S. 1014 (2002). [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:35 am
Briefly: In an op-ed in the Washington Examiner, Bradley Smith urges the court to grant review in a campaign finance case challenging restrictions on contributions to state and local political parties, arguing that it “makes no sense to send state and local parties to the back of the bus when it comes to political campaigns. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Gucci v Guess trial kicks off in Manhattan For the past three years, luxury Italian fashion brand Gucci has been in a trade mark infringement dispute with mid-market fashion brand, Guess, over Guess's products which incorporate various Gucci trade marks and get-up such as Gucci's notable green and red strip design (US Trade Mark No.s 1, 483,526 and 1, 122, 789), the "square G" design (US Trade Mark Nos. 3,037,082, 2,214,272 and… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld previews Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
Let's see what the Secretary for State says.Something to read? [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Marks tells all.* Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not overAfter many posts on Smith & Nephew v Convatec (Court of Appeal judgment here, here, and here; first instance judgment of Mr Justice Birss here), Neil covers the last episodes of the series, both in the UK and in Eponia.* Best thing since sliced bread -- or even better? [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:05 pm
Smith (traveling alone), with United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Category: 101 By: Eric Paul Smith, Contributor TitleCyberfone Systems, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
Pardhan et al. (1999) 85 C.P.R. (3d) 489 Affirming 77 C.P.R. (3d) 501 (FCA)· Smith & Nephew Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm
” That was the question from Washington attorney Paul Smith, arguing at the Court today on behalf of the five-member independent commission charged with drawing new state legislative maps for Arizona. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
The Egilman Challenge There was a challenge to the testimony of another expert witness, David Egilman, a frequent testifier for Mark Lanier and other lawsuit industrialists. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 1:30 am
First, Kerr says that Smith is inconsistent with United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:41 am
United States, Smith v. [read post]
