Search for: "Matter of Neal"
Results 181 - 200
of 777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2019, 11:20 pm
No matter how much you eat it grows just that much faster. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm
Richard Neal, the chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:50 pm
Once again though, it ultimately didn’t matter. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:44 pm
in addition, before the hearing the highest ranking Republicans on the Subcommittees for Select Revenue Measures, Worker and Family Support, and Social Security respectively, Representatives Kevin Brady, Adrian Smith, Jackie Walorski, and Tom Reed, sent a letter to Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA), urging the emphasis of incentives over “one size, fits all mandates. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:45 am
And, for that matter, to Steve Mnuchin, not to mention his legal adviser, Bill Barr. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 11:59 am
In a 2015 study, Professors Adam Bonica, Adam Chilton and Maya Sen constructed a data-backed account of how attorneys’ preferences matter as well. [read post]
Argument analysis: Spinning heads and swimming constitutional rights in debates over an accrual rule
18 Apr 2019, 8:11 am
Arguments of petitioner McDonough Neal Katyal represented McDonough, launching the parade of metaphors. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
For the symposium on Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum's new book, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2019).Neal Devins and Larry BaumThanks to Jack Balkin for organizing and writing for this symposium; thanks too to all the participants for working so carefully through the ideas and evidence in the book and offering such insightful comments. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
But that is a matter of luck, not inevitability. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum's new book, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2019). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum's new book, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2019). [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:53 am
When the delegates could not agree on a solution, the question was referred to the Committee on Postponed Matters, which included Gouverneur Morris and James Madison. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
L. 263 (2010] Further complicating matters, the public’s response to the Supreme Court has changed in recent years. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum's new book, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2019).Richard L. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:11 am
Does It Matter? [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:30 am
CU Denver|Anschutz Ombuds Melissa Connell (Director), Lisa Neale (Associate Director) and Teresa Ralicki said that they intend to also utilize this document for marketing purposes as well as a visual “elevator speech” for those unfamiliar with their services. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:45 am
Who was the dope who drafted these regs that allowed the Special Counsel to make the choice not to decide, Neal? [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:05 am
This is an issue that has been puzzling courts since at least the 1990s, and I thought I would explain the new decision and why it matters. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:13 am
Then we might end up with a decisive precedent, to the effect that section 107 (or at least section 107(2), the cash allowances aspect) either is or isn’t constitutional.If one were handicapping the outcome of this still-hypothetical case, it would of course be of enormous predictive moment that the Scalia seat ended up going to Neal Gorsuch, rather than to Merrick Garland. [read post]
