Search for: "May v. AC & S, INC."
Results 181 - 200
of 406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The threshold of seriousness Master Bell reflected upon two notable cases, Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 7:05 am
He may be reached at 617-582-3875 or gshapiro@newmanshapiro.com. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 75 [week ending on Sunday 6 December] – BHG on blocking injunctions | IP in Universities | Sweden on blocking injunctions | Canadian musings on patents | US Senate and trade secret reform | Chinese IP Courts | G1/14 referral and Article 108 EPC | PACE procedure (Procedure for Accelerated Conduct of Examination) ant the EPO | Greekat and trade mark partenalism | EPO Boards of Appeal tell AC:… [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:30 am
ACE American Insurance Co v Toledo Engineering Co Inc. case number 2:18-cv-11503 in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At the Connecticut Law Tribune (registration may be required), Dwight Merriam calls the court’s ruling last week in Knick v. [read post]
8 Mar 2006, 5:12 am
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
However, if the test was instead that of the House of Lords in George Hensher Ltd v Restawhile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd [1976] AC 64 (a case decided under the 1956 Copyright Act), the conclusion could be that the claimant's work may not qualify for protection.At this point, HHJ Hacon turned to EU law and the interpretation given of it by the CJEU.Applying CofemelBefore considering Cofemel, the judge recalled the earlier CJEU decision in Levola… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
(See, e.g., Qualcomm, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:41 am
Merke & Co., Inc v Ace American Insurance Company and other insurers: Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division: Docket No A-1879/21 & A-1882/21 [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
AC iii! [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
We hold that the Tygar-Yee article was publicly ac- cessible. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
The name of the game is to match the hair to the IP personality.* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Lilly ADHD dispute (Part I)* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Eli Lilly ADHD dispute (Part II)Annsley reports on the brand spanking new specialist Patents Court judge Mr Justice Carr’s decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2015] EWHC. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
RTX Scientific, Incorporated v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:11 am
V, 23, § 5º, 24, inc. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:24 am
Peck v Ian S. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
This Anheuser-Busch decision was held to be entirely consistent with Lord Diplock’s speech in the landmark Advocaat passing-off case of Erven Warnink BV v J Townend & Sons (Hull) Ltd [1979] AC 731. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:56 am
Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc., 361 U.S. 288, 293 (1960). [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
Polmear and another v Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, heard 15th May 2023. [read post]
