Search for: "May v. Department of Corrections et al"
Results 181 - 200
of 439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
O’Reilly, et al., 1 Food & Drug Admin. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Salazar v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 2:00 am
Tri-Modal Distribution Services, Inc., et al. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
John Vannatta, Department of Corrections, et al. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm
" CBD called on Hastings to correct the information. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:34 pm
The case is Blagojevich, et al., v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook 318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
Wagler, et al (NFP), a 30-page opinion, Judge Kirsch's dissent begins:Multiple motions. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
" In Save the Valley, Inc., Thomas and Jae Breitweiser, et al v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:59 pm
Department of Health and Human Services, et al., v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
Indiana Department of Correction, et al. , a 20-page opinion, Judge Crone writes:Eric D. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:12 am
The Guild is not correct. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
First, not all foodborne illnesses are reported to CDC as described by Mead et al (1999). [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 11:44 am
Department of Enforcement v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Decided on June 16, 2022 No. 55 [*1]In the Matter of DCH Auto, & c. et al., Appellants, vTown of Mamaroneck, & c., et al., Respondents. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Decided on June 16, 2022 No. 55 [*1]In the Matter of DCH Auto, & c. et al., Appellants, vTown of Mamaroneck, & c., et al., Respondents. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
This is in line with may prior lines of cases. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Le juge a exposé et appliqué correctement le droit relativement aux éléments constitutifs des infractions. 3) Motivation insuffisante et non-respect des critères établis dans R c. [read post]
