Search for: "Mays v. Holland" Results 181 - 200 of 771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2022, 7:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals from time to time says that only a few months will permit such an inference,  including Hollander v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:05 am
The decision in Quickturn Design Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:11 am
The other newly granted cases raise these issues:   the scope of federal appeals courts’ authority to overturn a conviction that may have been based in part on conduct that was not criminal when it occurred (U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Jay Willis
Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor and Dwyer Arce of the Jurist both have coverage of the decision in Holland v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:02 am
Thirty-six women wearing orange dresses available from the leading Dutch beer brand Bavaria (although bearing no logo) were apparently ejected from the Holland v Denmark game by a Fifa official, despite having tickets for the match, which were kindly supplied to them by ITV pundit and one-time mediocre footballer Robbie Earle. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Jones, 184 U.S. 598 (1902) Holland Furniture Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
Holland of the Associated Press reports on Wednesday’s oral argument in Unite Here Local 355 v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 8:22 am
 Trade marksIP Draughts provides further comment on the recent Court of Appeal decision Holland And Barrett International Ltd & Anor v General Nutrition Investment Company [2018], relating to the interpretation of trade mark agreements: Interpreting trade mark agreements. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court also refused to aggregate the employees of both to satisfy the ADEA’s minimum-employee threshold (Bridge v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on Davis v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm by Larry
Mainly because I just read Links Snacks, Inc. v. [read post]