Search for: "Means v. Means"
Results 181 - 200
of 98,522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2024, 9:39 am
Zesty Paws LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
Make UC A Good Neighbor v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
For example, in Watts v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:33 am
This case highlighted the importance of considering the mark's content beyond its motion even if the movement as such is decisive for the classification of the type of mark:From cases such as Alkim, Prada, and Savencia it follows that only a mark, consisting of the appearance of the product itself, which significantly diverges from the norm or customs of the relevant sector and, therefore, is capable of fulfilling its original essential function, is not devoid of distinctive character within… [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
Michael Showalter has posted Palmer v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
… Canadian Privacy Law Blog OKImportant new Ontario court decision on privilege in incident response documentation The Ontario divisional court has just released a decision, LifeLabs LP v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am
A.M.P. v Benjamin, 201 AD3d 50, 57 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
Iron Balls International Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 2:43 am
Baker v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am
§ 112(a))Enablement was considered by the US Supreme Court in Amgen v Sanofi, with respect to an antibody genus claim. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
On February 23, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Fast forward almost 90 years, in Seila Law v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm
The case is Murthy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 1:10 pm
C v Oldham Council. (2024) EWCC 1 (Judgment can be found here) Hynek v LB Islington. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:39 am
Potanas v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
National Security Archive v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
I haven’t taken the time to review the file, but the first place I’d turn would be the evidence supporting that the trademark owner had established sufficient secondary meaning for the term “Texas Tamale. [read post]
