Search for: "Michigan v. Smith" Results 181 - 200 of 667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:21 am by Liisa Speaker
Michigan Court of Appeals (MCOA) in Kevin Smith v City of Flint, No. 320437, a for publication opinion, affirms lower court grant of summary disposition on Plaintiff’s claim under the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA) MCL 15.361 et seq.Facts: Kevin Smith, plaintiff and a police officer with the Flint Police Department, had been president of the City of Flint Police Officers Union since February 2011. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
’ Chris Silver Smith on Search Engine Land has given some advice to defamation victims who wish to proceed in the current climate, given that Google has “essentially halted processing of defamation removal requests. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Smith Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School    --Cardozo on the Supreme CourtRobert Pushaw, James Wilson Endowed Professor, Pepperdine University School of Law    --Justice Cardozo on the Burgeoning Administrative StateSteven L. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Smith, supra, at 462–63; see also Azure Networks, LLC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 4:41 am by SHG
Unless a legislature decides to title a law the “Retroactive Punishment of Child Molesters Statute,” the Supreme Court of the United State has held in Smith v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 9:01 am by Mays & Kerr LLC
In Stephens’ case, she had strong evidence that the funeral home fired her for exactly the sort of sex stereotyping that the Sixth Circuit forbade in its 2004 decision of Smith v. [read post]