Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
The Verdict and Reactions Microsoft appealed the decision of the European Commission. [13] On September 17, 2007, The European Court of First Instance (the equivalent of a United States Appeals level court) upheld the decision reached in 2004 and reaffirmed victory by the EU. [14] The court found that "Microsoft abused its dominant position in the software world to hold back competition in everything from operating systems to server… [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 3:16 am
In the United States the parties want a final FRAND ruling (they disagree only on details), which Google will then appeal. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 11:34 am
Supreme Court on Oct. 16, 2017, announced it had granted the government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 12:13 am
The ITC said Microsoft should instead request an ITC enforcement proceeding.The last item on that docket of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is a procedural order (allowing some filings) of March 31, 2014. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:46 pm
Microsoft had an interesting choice of law clause in its Xbox 360 warranty: If you acquired the Xbox Product in the United States, the laws of the State of Washington, U.S.A., will apply to this Limited Warranty. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
So far, Microsoft appears to have hoped it could have its cake and eat it: keep imposing similar terms as Apple and Google on XBox game makers while forcing Apple and Google to give Microsoft and others more favorable terms. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
Because we focus here on the cy près distribution of unclaimed settlement proceeds, we note only that following a 1999 federal court trial of state and federal antitrust actions, the district court found against Microsoft, see United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:01 am
In this post here I'd like to share with you the opening brief that Google's Motorola Mobility filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit earlier this week in the Microsoft v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:59 am
A week ago the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) tossed Motorola's complaint against Microsoft's Xbox. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 7:15 am
Let's hope that SCO v IBM will finally produce the desired result. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 11:31 am
The patch is "required for the United States" and blocks updated versions of Word from reading "the Custom XML elements contained within DOCX, DOCM, or XML files. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 11:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
Shortly thereafter, it filed a trademark application for “APP STORE” in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
28 May 2006, 10:11 pm
Specifically, §271(f) of the Patent Act has been put in question in the case of Microsoft Corp v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:22 am
US Supreme Court Accepts Microsoft Appeal in i4i CaseEarlier today the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking no part in the decision or petition. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:19 am
Robart, the federal judge presiding over the Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:11 am
In Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 12:08 pm
This is my second post today on Wednesday's filings in the Microsoft v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:28 pm
Two courts have determined that a defendant “purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting business in the United States by distributing the Infringing content on platforms such as the Google Play store and Microsoft App store. [read post]
