Search for: "Miller v. Deal"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2020, 6:46 am
Mr Miller had a flat on a 125 year lease. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
.- Article 139(3) EPC is the sole article in the EPC that deals with double patenting, and it gives competence to the Contracting States to legislate on this issue. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Stone & Strauss: By coincidence, the next two volumes in the series, which will be published in 2020, both deal with the issue of religion. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:48 am
”) State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:56 pm
(Wright and Miller). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Stopthemillenniumhollywood.com, et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 11:39 am
In Miller Marital Deduction Trust, et al. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Frese v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Deal structures surrounding physician practice acquisitions by hospitals are complex and difficult to navigate. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
Deal structures surrounding physician practice acquisitions by hospitals are complex and difficult to navigate. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
In 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
I hope we learn more here about how data can help avoid lawsuits or at least reduce the expense of dealing with them Speakers: James Lee, CEO/Co-Founder, LegalMationPatrick V. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:43 pm
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:17 am
Robles, involving whether the accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to websites and apps; Miller v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
., the declaratory judgment controversy and the legal challenges to the New Deal). [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
Its decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
