Search for: "Mount v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 2,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2007, 8:20 am
Condon had mounted a “states rights” challenge to The Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A General Municipal Law §207-a(2) salary supplement becomes payable by the employer upon a firefighters retirement with accidental or line of duty disability benefitsMasullo v City of Mount Vernon, 2016 NY Slip Op 04225, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Fire Commissioner of the City of Mount Vernon adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer, made after a hearing, and denied disabled firefighter Michael Masullo’s application for supplemental salary… [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 11:18 am
Thus, it is little surprise that a majority of active judges concluded this was not the rare case worthy of en banc review.Yet to read the dissent from denial of rehearing en banc, one would think that we mounted a full-on federal takeover of the Nevada state courts. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:32 pm
The perils of handling an accident claim that implicates law outside of the lawyer's home state was underscored once again in the Maryland Court of Special Appeals opinion this month, in Bryan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
Mount Zion Church of God in Christ v Garden City, KS, 6:14-cv-01361-CM-KGS (D. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
Mount Zion Church of God in Christ v Garden City, KS, 6:14-cv-01361-CM-KGS (D. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 2:59 pm by Unknown
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
This mounting evidence of serious cost, financing and other concerns in state-run exchanges creates new reason for concern about the future of ACA’s health care reforms even for those citizens of states whose eligibility for subsidies is not challenged by the King v. [read post]