Search for: "P D v. Review Board" Results 181 - 200 of 823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
The decision of the Governor in Council is then subject to review by this Court under section 55 of the National Energy Board Act. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at The Daily Journal, Glenn Roper finds it troubling that, in Financial Oversight Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The government may demand a large volume of documents, and review and production of those documents generate enormous fees and costs. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
Finally, the court denied review in Avery v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Windy City has notable implications for the system of inter partes review proceedings before the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968), and the more recent Garcetti v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
Inter partes review is good but is under threat. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Coopers and Lybrand, 1978 CanLII 13 (SCC), [1979] 1 S.C.R. 495, at p. 503; Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 8:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Michael P Theroux and April D Grosse theorize in the Alberta Law Review that the common law doctrine of force majeure arose in part to overcome the narrow scope of the doctrine of frustration. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 27 January 2020 the Government published its response to the Cairncross Review on its website. [read post]