Search for: "PEOPLE v. SAMPLE" Results 181 - 200 of 1,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
The sixth circuit court made a decision about sampling which again altered the way it was governed in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am by Steven G. Pearl
People seem to forget that the Court has no deadline for hearing cases on its docket, as demonstrated by the fact that it took more than five years to decide Martinez v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 9:16 pm
  Her line of handbags, Claire V., was conceived on a trip to Cambodia as a way of aiding its impoverished people, and the bags are crafted by survivors of land mine injuries. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:47 am by Hannah Zhao
If a DNA sample is like a fingerprint, analyzing mixed DNA samples in criminal prosecutions can often be like attempting to isolate a single person’s print from a doorknob of a public building after hundreds of people have touched it. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:33 am by Rebecca Jeschke
In Johnson, the defendant was allegedly linked to a series of crimes by a software program called TrueAllele, used to evaluate complex mixtures of DNA samples from multiple people. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 10:07 am
Had the White House been straight with the American people, diplomacy could have succeeded, making military action unnecessary. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 10:55 am by Evan M. Levow
One rule created by the Chun decision requires women who are over sixty years of age to provide a smaller breath sample than other people, based on findings that women at that age are generally unable to provide as much breath as their male peers. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:26 pm by Richard D. Friedman
In prior posts on this blog, including one discussing the fine opinion in People v. [read post]