Search for: "POTTER v DISTRICT COURT"
Results 181 - 200
of 280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
Potter (federal employees protection against retaliation for complaining about age bias in workplace)06-1346 -- Ali v . [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:44 am
The federal district court denied the plaintiffs' motion to remand the case back to state court and granted the defendant's motion to dismiss. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
And, the Court’s decision 23 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
Faced with this novel issue, a district court agreed that the failure to consider fair use when sending a DMCA notice could give rise to a claim of failing to act in good faith. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:05 pm
" Goffe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:21 am
And perhaps, life is easier if you tell your teenager that you might let her read “The Color Purple”, “To Kill a Mockingbird” or Harry Potter but the school district says it’s wrong. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:16 am
What became known as the Baldus study was the centerpiece of the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
Matter of Potter v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Housing Auth. of Baltimore City, 984 F.2d 622, 632 (4th Cir. 1993) (finding district court abused its discretion in refusing to consider regulatory agency’s assessment of defendant’s compliance with agency regulations and noting that the district “court should welcome [the agency’s] appraisal of [the defendant’s] compliance with regulations, given its concern for deference to agency interpretations of its own regulations”). [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:02 am
District Judge Henry Morgan of the Eastern District of Virginia, now deceased, discovered the conflict near the end of the bench trial in Centripetal Networks v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
Sandoval and Zuni Public School District No. 89 v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Any person has standing to bring false patent marking claim: Simonian v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:03 pm
A federal district court invalidated the map last year as a partisan gerrymander, and the case is here on direct appeal. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am
Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter (2021) EWCA Civ 339 ‘Deliberate concealment’ under Section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 – a ‘deliberate breach of duty’ under s.32(2) was clarified by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 4:37 am
Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:04 am
Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., which is pending in federal court in the Western District of North Carolina. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Zim Direct Marketing LTD (IP Factor) Supreme Court affirms Tel Aviv District Court ruling that where Customs was dealing with the issue, they would not get involved: Imperiat TsaAttsuim vs. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Zim Direct Marketing LTD (IP Factor) Supreme Court affirms Tel Aviv District Court ruling that where Customs was dealing with the issue, they would not get involved: Imperiat TsaAttsuim vs. [read post]
