Search for: "Pennington v. Pennington" Results 181 - 200 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Other cases, including Gros v Crook ((1969) 113 SJ 408) and Citizens Life Assurance Co Ltd v Brown ([1904] AC 423) appeared to support that approach. [read post]
14 May 2022, 9:31 am by Mavrick Law Firm
So long as the employer’s proffered reason for the adverse employment action is “one that might motivate a reasonable employer,” Pennington v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 2:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
From today's Florida Court of Appeals decision in Sewell v. [read post]
They argue that their conduct constitutes protected petitioning activity and is thus completely immune from liability under the Petition Clause, and the Noerr-Pennington doctrine that developed out of it. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Judge Vardaro reviewed a line of cell phone as punitive damages cases, including Pennington v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
This case concerned asymmetric comparison (which Lindsay helpfully termed “comparing apples v pears”). [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 7:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Pennington Seed, Inc., 466 F.3d 1053, 1059 (Fed. [read post]