Search for: "People v Christopher B." Results 181 - 200 of 347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Christopher Buccafusco, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law/Benjamin N. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 1 | Ellen Goodman (Rutgers), Moderator  Access and Development: The History of ‘Development’ and WIPOSara Bannerman (McMaster University)Commentator | Christopher S. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
 We still impart incredible significance in sentencing to chance:  A and B may commit the exact same crime, in exact same settings, but if A's victim falls one way, and B's victim falls another, the punishment we give to identical acts is often radically disparate.P.S. - As to how Ms. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Christopher Newman, George Mason: Fair use is not holistic enough. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
B Dental’s actions have been condemned by Yelp. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Hodge Jones & Allen LLP v Times Newspapers Ltd (b)  Brand v NGN (c)  Walliams v NGN. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm by Lucy Reed
It worries me that people swallow what they read without checking the sources. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am by Jeff Welty
Christopher Tyner, our excellent research attorney, unearthed the following cases: State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 pm by Wystan Ackerman
State Attorney General Suits:  Christopher Curran, who argued Mississippi v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:23 am
`had [evidentiary] value where people were talking about stuff  [Plunkett] believed to be drugs. [read post]