Search for: "People v Christopher R." Results 181 - 200 of 467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
(See: Christopher Moore, The Law Society of Upper Canada and Ontario’s Lawyers 1797-1997 (University of Toronto Press, 1997). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm by Christopher Bird
From a statutory standpoint, Canada only allows fair dealing exemptions for use of copyrighted material when the intended use is for research, public study, criticism/review, or news reporting.Unlike the United States, which explicitly outlines other factors by which a given use of copyright material could be considered a fair use, in Canada most people accused of copyright infringement and pleading a fair dealing defense must rely on CCH v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am by Adam Chandler
  Christopher Eisgruber, a former Stevens clerk, has a tribute to Stevens in the L.A. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) Cruddas v Calvert, heard 9, 10 and 11 December 2014 (Jackson, Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ) OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:46 pm by David Bernstein
Skillman Hardware Co., 76 N.J. 45 (1908); People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm by Smita Ghosh
Slater-Chandler) and Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia’s Beyond Deportation: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Cases (review by R. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 17 December 2013, the Court Martial Appeal Court (Lord Chief Justice, Tugendhat and Holroyde JJ) will give judgment in the case of R v Marines A to E. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:38 am by Brian Cordery
Whilst such steps would require an enormous amount of work, significant funding and a large team of people, it was nevertheless all common general knowledge and did not involve an undue burden. [read post]