Search for: "People v Colin"
Results 181 - 200
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 4:24 pm
In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must make the claimant identifiable (whether explicitly or not) and it must carry a meaning that “[substantially] affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the claimant], or has a tendency to do so” (see Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB)). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
I am writing to invite you to participate in an Amicus Curiae brief of “Scientists and Scholars of Fingerprint Identification” in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case Acosta-Roque v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Purely personal opinion and bias were the key drivers of argument, but neither party was especially in tune with or supportive of the opinions of the other; a case of Paul Simon’s “people talking without speaking, people hearing without listening”. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Calloway, Colin G. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Calloway, Colin G. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
For instance, in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
He added: “The only people I think need privacy are people who do bad things. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
As similarly confirmed by CanLII’s former President, Colin Lachance in, “Law’s Reverse Musical Chair Challenge” (Slaw, June 16, 2016). [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:15 am
(See paragraph 135 et seq of the ICJ’s 2015 Judgment in Croatia v Serbia.) [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
The recent Parker v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
And here’s one application of the law, from Thomas v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
” More than 43,000 people signed the campaign’s petition. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
Around 2,900 people have contacted the police to ask if their voicemails have been hacked. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
Trust gets transactions done and people talking. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:18 pm
CE, and more formally through the Tunjur people in the 14th c. [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:17 pm
CE, and more formally through the Tunjur people in the 14th c. [read post]
