Search for: "People v High"
Results 181 - 200
of 13,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
Her appeal was dismissed by the High Court and the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 10:58 am
Wade last year in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
" That's self-defense, even though it's based upon a mistake of fact.You can see why we don't punish people for that. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
In California v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 11:57 am
Supreme Court held in Powell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
All in all, this is the first time the High Court has considered internet publication since 2001 in Gutnick v Dow Jones. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 4:40 pm
The inclusion of the brief footage – which was used as background to a report of a planning dispute over fracking operations at Horse Hill in Surrey – resulted from “a catalogue of serious errors by a number of people that should have been, but were not picked up by any of the internal systems and safeguards that were put in place to regulate what is broadcast”, two High Court judges said in a decision R (On the Application Of Finch) v Surrey County… [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am
Dissatisfied with the ruling, the CNIPA appealed to the Beijing High People’s Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:48 pm
The Supreme Court this morning decided Kennedy v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:29 am
Town of Atherton v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
Many of the clients in the ACLU’s trans rights cases are high school students. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 7:13 am
In 1985, the pivotal legal case Handschu v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:39 am
It's pretty obvious that the statute is directed at people who convince minors to make kiddie porn, right? [read post]
12 May 2021, 5:42 am
Knoll for people charged with a DWI. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 9:52 am
The cases to be argued are: • People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:22 pm
Antrim Truck Centre Ltd v Ontario (Minister Of Transportation)" (2011) 90 Can Bar Rev 215. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:22 pm
Gets High Court Hearing. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:03 pm
That determination was made before the high court set new standards in the 2002 ruling. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:49 am
In People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
The high term on the main count -- three years -- plus another concurrent two years.Take that. [read post]
