Search for: "People v. Brown (1995)" Results 181 - 200 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
Reading the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Brown v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
But some of that work was as a consultant to Thurgood Marshall in preparing the Supreme Court case Brown v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 In Henry v Cash Biz the Supremes had another chance to demonstrate their commitment to denying people harmed by shady business practices from getting any relief from the State’s judicial system; they embraced that opportunity wholeheartedly as much as coldheartedly, with not a single member of the court writing in dissent. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm by Colin Murray
Last year’s Court of Human Rights judgment in Ponomaryov v Bulgaria did affirm (at [56]) that the right did not necessarily have the same effect at all levels of education and that, “at the University level, which so far remains optional for many people, higher fees for aliens – and indeed fees in general – seem to be commonplace and can, in the present circumstances, be considered fully justified. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Roger Pilon
In this context, the most important test of the judicial restraint that flowed from the New Deal came, of course, in Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and then worked as a private attorney until 1995. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Several people have commented that switching from grain to grass feeding could be one of the solutions to the problem with foodborne pathogens in cattle and other livestock. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Sarah Deutsch, Mayer Brown: Was intentionally broad to cover all kinds of ISPs, hosts, conduits, providers of facilities. [read post]