Search for: "People v. David (1991)" Results 181 - 200 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm by Schachtman
Yard PCB Litig., 916 F.2d 829, 856-57 (3d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 961 (1991); Hines v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am by Amy Howe
A year later, the Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 5:25 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
Generally, it is young people from lower-income communities—often black and Latino—who are under pressure to be informants. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am by Darren O'Donovan
Among the possible consequences of the judgment was that it was so broad that it raised issues regarding Ireland’s membership of the United Nations, a fact very well discussed by Heffernan and Whelan in a 1991 article. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:17 pm
What we now face is the contradiction between unbalanced and inadequate development and the people’s ever-growing needs for a better life. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
What we now face is the contradiction between unbalanced and inadequate development and the people’s ever-growing needs for a better life. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Wilander, 498 U.S. 337 (1991), and who has an employment-related connection to a vessel which is substantial in duration (more than 30% of one's work time is spent on a vessel or fleet of commonly owned or controlled vessels), Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution:  The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Similarly, Kennedy’s willingness to join with former Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and David Souter in protecting women’s right to choose in the 1992 Casey decision was important, to put it mildly.Even so, there were more than a few items on the other side of the ledger, including Kennedy’s cowardly vote in Bush v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm by Frank Pasquale
As David Rothkopf have observed, the two “superclasses” have far more in common with each other than they share with ancient dynasts or founding fathers. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am by Frank Pasquale
As David Rothkopf have observed, the two "superclasses" have far more in common with each other than they share with ancient dynasts or founding fathers. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]