Search for: "People v. Downing"
Results 181 - 200
of 18,948
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
But most all rules I have ever seen—especially in public address settings—do not go that far; they simply prevent “disruption” the way Stanford’s (and seemingly Maryland’s) own rules apparently do.So what can/ought we do with people who engage in shouting down? [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
Here is my post from when the panel opinion was handed down: [* * *] From today's Fifth Circuit decision in Book People, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:51 am
From yesterday's Ohio Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
MARBURY V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court issued the decision in Roe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
I attended oral arguments in the case Snyder v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 11:36 am
” In 2022, the US Supreme Court ruled in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:14 am
The trial judge agreed, effectively concluding that treaties were worthless until section 35 of the Charter “recognized and affirmed” the rights of Indigenous peoples. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
At the time of writing, judgment has not been handed down. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
The ECtHR and climate change The Grand Chamber’s ruling in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland [2024] ECHR 304, handed down on Tuesday, seems to have caused a (predictable) storm – and though nothing to do with “religion” specifically, it’s potentially very important in the wider area of human rights law. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
When this first use analysis is broken down between men and women, the result becomes even more fragile. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
(See DSM-V). [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
As Professor Mazzone and I explained in our column, the Court’s decision came down to the Court’s seeming belief in the need for a meaningful level of ballot uniformity across the nation, given that people in all states have input in choosing the President, as well as the President’s role as chief executive for the entire nation. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm
The Code gives the other Justices no authority to order him not to sit, but that doesn’t mean they are powerless to try to stop him from wreaking havoc on the reputation of the Court.Because of people’s already much-depleted confidence in the Court, and because of all that’s at stake for the nation in Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 10:57 am
McCommons v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
But Justice Mitchell is now a controversial figure, ever since he wrote the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion in LePage v. [read post]
