Search for: "People v. Greenfield" Results 181 - 200 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2010, 2:26 am
I've included some excerpts below. ...See all stories on this topic   People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:48 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
” Scott Greenfield questioned what jurisdiction the court has to punish her, an observer, at all. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:45 am by Jeff Gamso
 But occasionally its other things.Consider the Alford plea.The name comes from North Carolina v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
Just as corporations were winning more of the rights of people in constitutional law, corporate law was dictating that corporations value profit over all — that corporations become, as Kent Greenfield details in a terrific new book coming out this fall, less like people. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
  ["A recent case worth noting is University of Southern California v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
And don't forget to turn out the lights after everyone leaves the execution chamber.As I said, that's what I was going to write.But then Scott Greenfield wrote about the importance of continuing to focus on our issues, and trying to figure out how to keep the press/public interested. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:08 am by SHG
When SJ was in its infancy, a post of mine was picked up at Volokh Conspiracy, which was already a well-established blog, by Ilya Somin, who wrote: Over at Simple Justice, Scott Greenfield has an astonishing post about a criminal case that deserves much wider attention: People v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 3:33 am by SHG
  Even in its most extreme, People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 7:18 am
  Gideon at a public defender reports on State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:16 am by Eric Turkewitz
There are civil libertarians on both sides of the aisle: Joe Lieberman v. the Internet: It’s not over. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:47 am by SHG
In an effort to break the logjam, progressive advocacy group Demand Justice is planning a social media ad campaign on Monday that targets about 100,000 people around Washington, DC, arguing the court must hear the president’s financial records cases, collectively referred to as Trump v. [read post]