Search for: "People v. Hale"
Results 181 - 200
of 376
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Lord Kerr, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke dismissed National Grid’s appeal against this ruling. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:57 pm
Lady Hale accepts the validity of these criticisms and finds (para.36) that WCC gave no serious consideration to its obligations in Ms N’s case. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am
Lady Hale, Lord Reed and Lord Hughes concurred in both judgments. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
Parliament has further expressly provided, in sections 15 and 35, for disabled people to have rights in respect of the accommodation which they occupy which are different from and extra to the rights of non-disabled people. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm
There is absolutely no reason to believe that this information will be passed on to others to whom it should not be revealed or used to victimise people like Mr Catt. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:54 am
Davis v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
This was confirmed in the case of Douglas & ors v Hello! [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 9:12 pm
Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. (1959); United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
The panel will be Lord Neuberger Lady Hale, Lord Clarke Lord Wilson and Lord Toulson. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:37 pm
See Von Damm v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
” [63] (Lord Neuberger and Lord Judge: Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Mance, Kerr and Reed agreed) The decision of the Divisional Court Now the appeal in Beghal brings the issue squarely before the Court. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd [2014] UKSC 57 I will admit to being a bit cool on static caravan parks. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:08 am
You may recall in R (M) v Hammersmith LBC [2008] UKHL 14, Baroness Hale, after criticising the authority's failure to carry out an assessment of M for almost all of her judgment, decided that a young person could not be a former relevant child if the authority had not in fact provided the child with accommodation under s.20 even if they should have done. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
Lord Reed gave a concurring judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal (5-2; Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale giving strong dissenting judgments). [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:27 pm
, Hale v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
Regarding Taco Bell’s ads featuring people named Ronald McDonald enjoying their food. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:00 am
Indeed Lady Hale identified a number of judgments which she believes benefitted from the availability of her female perspective (including the case of Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust, which concerned “the damage done to a woman by an unwanted pregnancy”, or the case of Stack v Dowden, a famous case concerning joint ownership of a family home). [read post]
