Search for: "People v. Mann" Results 181 - 200 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 5:58 am by Alfred Brophy
 I suppose I need to add here that while this was completely unintentional on his part, Justice Thomas Ruffin was one of the most important people in our country in bringing about an end to slavery -- because his 1830 opinion in State v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
”  And Beverly Mann discusses the mistake and the case at Angry Bear. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:04 am by Timothy Simeone
During Wednesday’s argument in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:56 am by Amy Howe
  (Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog earlier this month.) [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm by Ken White
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:33 am by Stuart Benjamin
Circuit (again with Judge Tatel writing) found not to be common carriage regulations a year ago in Cellco Partnership v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:39 am by Katie Porter
And that's a fact that perhaps should play into what a "reasonable" v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
” Debate on last week’s oral arguments in McCutcheon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm by Dan Markel
That position, it turned out, was largely advanced in a thoughtful piece by GW prof Jeff Manns on Liberty Takings. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
For the reasons that follow, we affirm.Of the people involved:Dr. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:21 am by David Friedman
So would some people on my side of other issues. [read post]