Search for: "People v. Marks (1986)"
Results 181 - 200
of 301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
People get shot. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:16 pm
Still, people were upset about this practice when it came to light in the 1970s. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
” That opinion, Bowers v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:16 pm
Still, people were upset about this practice when it came to light in the 1970s. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
”); Mark R. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm
In Harrington v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Stanford Law Professor Mark LemleyMark A. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am
" Rosado v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 4:31 am
Some would argue that to blame the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, but not the Supreme Court’s decision in Mistretta v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
Schechter Poultry Corporation v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
Canada In the case of The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba v Jorgenson 2019 MBQB 87 Rempel J ordered a Winnipeg pharmacists to pay $150,000 in damages to his regulatory body which he accused of covering up the deaths of 24 indigenous people. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
Pix Credit hereThe greatest and most significant achievement during the last decades has been the independence from colonial and alien domination of a large number of peoples and nations which has enabled them to become members of the community of free peoples. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Several decades later, Judge Mark H. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 69, 106 S.Ct. 1697, 90 L.Ed.2d 48 (1986). [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
The matter was marked for conference and adjourned for two days, at which time the defendant requested a hearing to test the legality of the orders. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[7] Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8] These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
. balancing test"—that is, the second settled principle under the Dormant Commerce Clause.[24] The conclusion that the extraterritoriality principle is just a special case of one or both of the standard Dormant Commerce Clause tests makes sense of the decided cases, and of the Court's recent insistence that "two primary principles"—antidiscrimination and prohibition on undue burdens—"mark the boundaries of a State's authority to… [read post]
