Search for: "People v. Novo"
Results 181 - 200
of 544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 5:35 am
We review de novo a district court's conclusion that an officer had the constitutional ground to stop a motorist. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:29 am
You can challenge an agency decision in court, but courts will for the most part defer to that agency's expertise.The case is Wasser v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
(People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:32 am
On December 21, 2016, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:32 am
On December 21, 2016, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
Because summary judgment is a question of law, we review a trial court's summary judgment decision de novo. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit 1978) (government arranged for `mail cover,’ under which postal service provided government agency with information appearing on the face of envelopes or packages addressed to defendant); People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:08 pm
(People v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:17 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
Hart In West Chandler Boulevard Neighborhood Association v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm
That’s how the court in Higgins v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm
We employ de novo review over the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:21 am
Sorry about the pun — but then again, I’m not the PTO; then again, too, my attitude toward “scandalous and offensive” ethnic marks is different from that of lots of people, too. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am
Moore hadn’t, and so he claimed entitlement to a de novo resentencing. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:55 am
State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:39 pm
In Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 5:17 am
Lowe, supra.The Court of Appeals began its analysis of Lowe’s arguments on appeal by explaining that it reviewsde novo the district court's judgment denying Lowe's motion for acquittal. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
They “dispose of public rights held by the government on behalf of the people. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm
Should it instead have used a deferential version of de novo review? [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
