Search for: "People v. Williams (1970)" Results 181 - 200 of 328
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
The 1970s were also a period of innocence and ignorance. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
  To her, the Court’s 2012 decision in Fisher v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 3:26 am by INFORRM
 Like the others (Rai v Bholowasia, Asghar & Anor v Ahmad & Ors, Ma v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust) this was not a case against the mainstream media. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:20 pm by Kevin
In 1970, Time magazine described an author as "a colloidal suspension of William Buckley, William Blake and Herbert Marcuse in pure applesauce," which was not at all a compliment, but in the last few decades "pure applesauce" has generally been used to mean just pure applesauce. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am by Robert D. Durham
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Williams – Yulee v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:43 pm by Hannah Kiddoo
Opening with a clip of the band the Blue Notes performing in the 1970s, Davis and Soocher introduced the case of Cummings v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:56 am
 It really does make you feel like you dropped into a 1970s house party]. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm by James Fox
  Mary, like Deborah, reconceives the history from the 1970s-80s, but with a focus specifically on developments following Roe v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
He’s also the older brother of the late William F. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]