Search for: "Plank v. Plank"
Results 181 - 200
of 213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
He's talking about Schütz (UK) Ltd v Werit Ltd and Protechna SA [2010] EWHC 660 (Pat), a fascinating and pretty long (227 paragraph) ruling of Mr Justice Floyd, sitting in the Patents Court, England and Wales.Schütz owned two European patents (307 and 967) for intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) which consisted of a metal outer protective cage and a removable plastic inner bottle. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:05 am
Last week, in Park v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am
And it’s named after an inspiring figure: Raymond V. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
Rev. 367 ] which discussesthe Galen Suppes matter:In the pending case of Curators of the University of Missouri v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:01 pm
According to CNET at least two class actions have already been filed in the Californian courts, including one (Thomson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 1:52 pm
According to CNET at least two class actions have already been filed in the Californian courts, including one (Thomson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:29 am
Titanic, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 9:59 am
Hagy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:53 pm
In Keaney v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:55 pm
To take the converse of the golden outhouse hypothetical, imagine that an owner of a perfectly good wharf decides that he thinks that prime numbers are exceptionally lucky and so hires someone to destroy every horizontal wooden plank on the wharf except for the prime-numbered ones, thereby totally destroying its utility. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
Corp , 11 NY3d 757 (2008)(wooden planks that were used as a make-shift shelf above a door frame and fell, striking a worker, constituted the type of falling object risk that the statute protects against).Sanatass v Consolidated Inv. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:46 pm
Supreme Court decision, Quirin (1942), became the plank on which the Bush Administration had constructed a theory of plenary executive power to detain. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Rogers v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 6:22 pm
Petitioner testified that he had walked across the plank multiple times during his shift without noticing any snow or ice. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:08 pm
Matter of Hughes v Hevesi4. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:08 pm
In particular, the Journal is reporting that "one central plank of these new efforts is a plan for the Treasury to take approximately $250 billion in equity stakes in potentially thousands of banks. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 8:15 pm
Shiver me timbers, this is so unfair to every other person forced to walk the plank. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:42 am
Here's your chance to decide, based on the facts taken directly from the appellate court's opinion in Stephen Salinas v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 1:30 pm
The New York Court of Appeals in Quattrocchi v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:18 pm
" IPBiz asks, does anyone remember high throughput screening in Merck v. [read post]
