Search for: "Post v. Martin et al" Results 181 - 200 of 250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 7:23 am by Schachtman
Ware, et al., “Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials,” 357 New Engl. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Brussels I and Arbitration Revisited - The European Commission’s Proposal COM(2010) 748 final - Martin Illmer Abstract: In December 2010, the European Commission presented its long-awaited proposal for a reformed Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:47 am by John L. Welch
North Atlantic Operating Co., Inc., Opposition No. 91157248 et al. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm by Chris Martin
  Excess Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al vs Frank's Casing, 246 S.W. 42 (Tex. 2008). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am by Law Lady
APPALACHIAN TECHNICAL COLLEGE, JASPER GEORGIA, In their individual and official capacities, et al., Defendants, JOAN THOMPSON, Vice President, in their individual and official capacities, DR. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Harper, et al., The Law of Torts §§ 25.1, at 493 (2d ed. 1986)] (‘Harper’). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm by Jon L. Gelman
KBR, Inc., et al., No. 10-36000, US CTA 9th Cir., Decided December 14, 2010.Related articlesFederal Court Allows Burn Pit Claims to Proceed Against Halliburton & KBR (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Veteran Awarded Benefits for Burn Pit Exposure (burnpitclaims.blogspot.com)http://burnpitclaims.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:45 pm by joao_lima
As such, FRBROO manifests a great affinity to the LexML domain (“A Time-aware Ontology for Legal Resources,” João Lima et al. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Martin Goetz   Back on November 30, 2009, Patently-O published my article “In Defense of Software Patents” in response to the editorial “Abandoning Software Patents” by Ciaran O’Riordan, Director of End Software Patents (posted on Patently-O on November 6, 2009) which had as its premise that software companies are trying to protect “software ideas”. [read post]