Search for: "President Judge Determination Cases" Results 181 - 200 of 9,259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm
Death penalty cases, in particular, showed Judge Reinhardt at his finest. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am by John Floyd
Bates and the president who his determined to destroy the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:29 pm by Steve Gottlieb
So, Trump’s selection of a judge who doubts the legitimacy of investigating a sitting president strengthens his attacks on the ongoing investigation. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 10:16 am
According to the opinion by Judge Arthur Schwab, the president’s policy goes “beyond prosecutorial discretion” in that it provides a relatively rigid framework for considering applications for deferred action, thus obviating any meaningful case-by-case determination as prosecutorial discretion requires, and provides substantive rights to applicable individuals. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Textualism is another interpretative tool which stresses the language of a statute (or the Constitution) rather than external matters such as the legislative history, which many judges use to determine what Congress sought to accomplish with a statute. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 1:15 pm by Jodi Ginsberg
 Unlike a personal injury negligence case where a judge or jury serves as a finder of fact and determines whether you won or lost your casejudges in workers' compensation cases decide disputed issues. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:27 am by Brian E. Barreira
In Temporary Guardianship of Kenneth Simon, a Barnstable County, Massachusetts case, a Probate Court judge presided over a lengthy trial on the fees in the Temporary Guardian’s First and Final Account and ruled that the two attorneys involved in the case must reimburse the sum of $328,770.97 to the estate. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm by Adam Feldman
In parentheses are the parties of each judge’s appointing president and the appointing president’s initials. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Where the text is clear, such as the President must be at least 35 years old, judges simply need to be able to read (which is why cases involving clear constitutional language are almost never litigated). [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:00 am by Rebecca Ingber
Going forward, the costs may in many cases be marginal. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 5:07 am by Russell Knight
In cases where the judge has some kind of personal involvement, it’s usually up to the judge themselves to determine if they should remove (also known as “recuse”) themselves. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
Bill Clinton, in that case, argued that forcing a sitting president to answer a civil complaint would unduly distract him from his duties as president. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Judges Agee and Niemeyer also express great skepticism at the idea that “domestic” Establishment Clause cases that do not deal with foreign policy apply in this case and suggested that Mandel more clearly applies because it specifically involves immigration as well as the First Amendment. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
As I indicated in Part I of my series on this case, my view is that Judge Thacker reads certain statements from Trump and his associates out of context and reaches unsupported conclusions about the president’s post-inauguration purpose. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:59 pm by John Dean
Judicial decisions have two uses—first, to absolutely determine the case decided, and secondly, to indicate to the public how other similar cases will be decided when they arise. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:48 am by Thomas DeLorenzo
On Twitter, the president hailed the stay as a victory, saying that the case was politically motivated and that “a thing like this has never happened to any President before. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:22 am by Jacob Schulz
Like the American ex-president, Sarkozy faces a morass of legal problems—so many that anyone who learned Sarkozy had been convicted in a criminal case could be forgiven for asking: “Which one? [read post]