Search for: "Query v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2014, 10:44 am
The United States Code isn't listed in the FAQ, but when I searched for statutes I found them. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:00 am
From Salon: ACLU v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
(Here is audio of the September 9 argument in that campaign spending case, Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:35 pm
Back in August 2012, we reported on how the American Civil Liberties Union was compelling the FBI to fully disclose how it interprets the results of the United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial will begin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 9:04 am
In Kousisis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:48 pm
The United Kingdom currently permits whole life sentences but after the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Vinter v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Kerr queries why the prorogation needed to cover the conference recess. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm
Katz Technology Licensing LP (“Katz”) appeals from final judgments entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in a group of consolidated cases. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:50 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013 [D.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 11:08 am
The landmark ruling comes in a criminal case, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 1:53 pm
United States v Google LLC, 20-cv-3010 (APM) (D.D.C. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The behavior of the United States government in this case is not one of them. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:56 pm
Probably United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:51 am
Deauville, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:46 am
” “According to the department, without the judicially monitored restrictions, Google’s control over this key asset “would have substantially lessened competition among providers of comparative flight search websites in the United States, resulting in reduced choice and less innovation for consumers. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Compevo AB v. [read post]
