Search for: "Quick v. Department of Justice"
Results 181 - 200
of 675
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2020, 6:56 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 am
Last April, the Department of Justice announced that it had brought criminal charges against 24 individuals and 130 DME companies for their alleged participation in fraud schemes involving more than $1.2 billion in losses to insurance payors. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)’s Trusted Traveler programs. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
States were quick to pass new death penalty laws to address the concerns; the court upheld some of those statutes four years later in Gregg v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:29 am
Chief Justice William Howard Taft, in Myers v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
If you do any of these things, the Department of Justice (DOJ) will prosecute you, and you may go to prison for many years. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
This morning the justices will close out the January session with one oral argument, in Espinoza v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
As Neal Katyal and George Conway have argued, a number of senators who are considering what procedures to follow in this impeachment—and whether to call witnesses—are lawyers who should understand basic principles of the justice system. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
A quick DIG would allow the Justices to address another live case now. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:08 am
Doe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:19 am
No IT department needed. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:35 am
Quick to react, New York Governor Andrew M. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:33 am
Litigation filed in the public interest rather than to alleviate an individual harm is the proper business of the Department of Justice, which has no similar limits on standing to sue. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
So, to understand this clash of titans, let’s take a quick look at the main issues that require consideration. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:03 am
Wayfair Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority in Wayfair essentially removed the “physical presence” requirement established in Quill Corp v North Dakota, overruling it, along with National Bellas Hess v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
” Another look at some of the amicus briefs in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
The committee heard testimony from three witnesses: Brad Wiegmann, a deputy assistant attorney general in the Justice Department’s national security division; Michael Orlando, the deputy assistant director of the FBI’s counterterrorism division; and Susan Morgan, who has worked on operations at the National Security Agency (NSA) for 18 years. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
