Search for: "Reason v. General Motors Corp." Results 181 - 200 of 666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
  A few general conclusions can be advanced about this mode of reasoning: 1. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am by Schachtman
Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713, 718 (7th Cir. 2000). [8]  Bixby v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
General Motors Corp., 111 N.J. 238, 544 A.2d 357 (1988) (holding that a strict liability claim against General Motors for an unreasonably dangerous product defect was subject to apportionment for contribution from failing to wear a seat belt) (the jury’s right to apportion furthered the public policy of properly allocating the costs of accidents and injuries). [read post]