Search for: "Res-Care, Inc. v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 1,136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, class action funding arrangements are required to be disclosed by Standing Order of all judges in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
This paper draws a comparison between COVID claims and asbestos claims, the “Largest and Longest” wave of occupational disease claims in the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
Of course, there are such lobbyists, but the description misses one of the most powerful groups, the plaintiffs’ mass tort trial bar, the largest rent-seeking group in the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
United States, 509 U.S. 544, 550, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993), quoting M. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
If a physician deviates from the standard of care in rendering such an opinion, either negligently or intentionally, what remedies are available, and to whom? [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
 The Act gave all participants in a qualifying “professional review action” immunity from being held liable in damages “under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Sovereign Immunity; Federal Torts Claim Act) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPeople in Interest of K.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:26 pm by Unknown
United States (Sovereign Immunity; Federal Torts Claim Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPeople in Interest of K.C. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
In the face of this traditional judicial lassitude, “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof” were all a litigant could hope to accomplish in litigation. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
District Judge Kevin Castel of the Southern District Court of New York issued an injunction against Telegram Group Inc. [read post]