Search for: "Research in Motion Ltd"
Results 181 - 200
of 697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
In Kenya, the High Court issued a ruling in Osho Chemical Industries Ltd vs Moiben Connections Ltd & Jojemi East Africa Ltd, where the plaintiff had filed a motion seeking various orders, including a restraint on the defendants from passing off their products, infringing on the plaintiff's trademark 'MISTRESS,' and manufacturing, selling, or promoting products bearing the trade name 'IMPRESS' or any similar name. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 1:17 am
That’s the question Schlumberger Ltd. is raising in a new motion to disqualify a plaintiff’s inside and outside counsel in a federal patent case. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 1:17 am
That’s the question Schlumberger Ltd. is raising in a new motion to disqualify a plaintiff’s inside and outside counsel in a federal patent case. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 7:27 am
Tower Research Capital LLC, March 29, 2018, Walker, J.). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:54 pm
Research in Motion, Ltd., 418 F.3d 1282, 1320–21 (Fed.Cir.2005)). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
That case has survived a motion to dismiss, and I’ll post on it when there are further developments. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:52 pm
Patent Nos. 6,650,327 (the ‘327 patent), 6,816,145 (the ‘145 patent), and 5,717,881 (the ‘881 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San… [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 9:16 pm
The Court of Chancery in the case of In re Chelsea Therapeutics International Ltd. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm
Once valued at $32 billion, crypto exchange FTX Trading Ltd. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:01 am
The brief supported CCDH's motion to dismiss, arguing that the term of service against CCDH as it pertains to data scraping should be deemed void, and is contrary to the public interest. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:56 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Eastman Kodak Company and the Respondents are Research In Motion, Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation, and Apple Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:16 pm
., Ltd. and Nintendo of America Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:53 am
., Android developer Google Inc. and BlackBerry creator Research in Motion Ltd. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 12:54 pm
HD Supply Construction Supply, Ltd. is just such a typical case. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:24 pm
See also Group One, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 4:48 pm
Studio Imports Ltd., Inc., No. 12 CV 3858 (KMW), 2012 WL 4513546, *2 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:38 am
Sign up now for a free trial account and $100 of free research and downloads. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:26 am
Strange as a defendant, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.Plaintiffs were not required to submit an affidavit of merit or make any other evidentiary showing in support of their motion (see Berkeley Research Group, LLC v FTI Consulting, Inc., 157 AD3d 486, 490, 69 N.Y.S.3d 26 [1st Dept 2018]; Hickey v Steven E. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:09 pm
Ltd. [read post]
