Search for: "Robert J. Walters" Results 181 - 200 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Lisa LaPlante was appointed as interim director of the Thomas J. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Jefferson County Board of Education (05-915) At Slate, Dahlia Lithwick has these initial reactions to today's opinion in her ongoing conversation with Walter Dellinger and Stuart Taylor weighs in here; Tony Mauro of the Legal Times reports here on the school ruling on a "historic final day of the Supreme Court term"; and Washington Post Staff Writer Robert Barnes reports here that a "splintered Supreme Court today threw out school desegregation plans from… [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:00 am by Wells Bennett
Only one, AE168, requires argument from counsel, J. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:15 am
Spangler 0 240,000 (29,483) 210,5170210,517 Robert L. [read post]
29 May 2017, 9:45 pm by The Regulatory Review
A Good Effort, with One Glaring Flaw May 8, 2017  | Richard J. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Meade J therefore reached the conclusion that he should put significantly more weight on Prof Purat’s evidence. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Progressivity Walter J Blum & Harry Jr Kalven, Uneasy Case for Progressive Taxation, The, 19 U. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Dutton, University of Southern California, Julia Lefkowitz, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford Retrievable Images on Social Media Platforms: A Call for a New Privacy Tort, Zahra Takhshid, Harvard Law School Digital Consent and Data Protection Law – Europe and Asia-Pacific Experience, Leon Trakman, University of New South Wales (UNSW) – Faculty of Law, Robert Walters, Victoria University, Bruno Zeller, University of Western Australia –… [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
In an article for the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Christopher J. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
” At first instance, Meade J held that the Patent was invalid for lack of plausibility and lack of technical contribution over the prior art. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am by Erin Miller
In commentary for the Baltimore Sun, attorney J. [read post]