Search for: "Rock v. Rock" Results 181 - 200 of 5,732
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In addition, the Circuit Court noted that Plaintiff did not allege facts sufficient to raise an inference that HRA's actions were taken because of her race or disability, citing Vega v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
Hoeflich and Stephen Sheppard, Lucy and the Judge:  Wood v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:22 am by Mohammed Chavoos
This blog was co-authored by Jessica Blunden, Candidate Attorney The recent judgment in Ashton International College Ballito (Pty) Ltd v Erasmus and Another serves as a deterrent to practitioners and clients not to copy and paste clauses obtained from precedents into agreements without proper thought and it emphasises the need for accurate drafting. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am by Eric Goldman
Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:21 pm
Oh, and a year and a half later, Myles tries to get back in to "his" house and hits a window of the house with a rock -- which doesn't break the window -- and all of this is caught on a Ring system, so Myles is charged with attempted burglary for that as well.What sentence, you think? [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:06 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
D&B Marine, LLC v AIG Property Casualty Co. case no COA22-546 in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am by Eugene Volokh
There, a group petitioned to use a city- operated municipal auditorium to present the rock musical "Hair. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 3:45 am by jonathanturley
” The lawsuit was tossed after SPLC successfully argued that the ministry had to satisfy the higher standard for defamation under New York Times v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: A recent decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court, Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd [2019] AC 119, held that compliance with form requirements for contractual modification is mandatory, and that non-compliant agreements are ineffective. [read post]