Search for: "Rose v. Ames" Results 181 - 200 of 451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm by Pierre T. Nguyen
  Nous avons par la suite appris qu’une équipe de parachutistes de l’armée américaine se nomme les… Golden Knights. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 11:50 am by Kevin
In other trademark news, it seems doubtful to me that you could get away with calling your business “Texas Guns and Roses,” even if you do in fact sell both guns and roses and you spell out the conjunction in full. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 8:14 am by Brian Cuban
In the end, I am glad the protesters were escorted out. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:43 am
  Rather, I paint in broad brush strokes at the level of entire bodies of law — contract law v. employment law, etc. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
I am not talking secondary source material. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
Acuff-Rose, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), which held that an alleged rap parody of the popular song Pretty Woman could qualify as a parody protected by the copyright fair use doctrine. [read post]