Search for: "STARR v. PAGE" Results 181 - 200 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Horse Of A Different Color: CEQA Does Not Require EIR Due To Psychological And Social Impacts From Closure Of Beloved Equestrian Boarding Facility In Small “Country” City
11 Mar 2016, 5:18 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Preserve Poway v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Maricopa: Once More Into the Breach
24 Mar 2010, 11:30 pm by Jeff Gamso
Independent Bar Counsel Gleason shall investigate and, as he determines appropriate, prosecute allegations of ethical misconduct stemming from the prosecution in State v. [read post]
Gamso - For the Defense - http://gamso-forthedefense.blogspot.com/
California Supreme Court Holds In 5-2 Decision, Over Chief Justice’s Strong Dissent, That Federal Power Act Does Not Fully Preempt CEQA’s Application to FERC’s Licensing Process for State-Owned and Operated Hydroelectric Projects
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  County of Butte v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Court Addresses CEQA Subsequent Review Rules in San Mateo Gardens Case
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Proposed CEQA Guidelines Amendments: A Critique of OPR’s “Preliminary Discussion Draft” (Part II – Proposed “Substance” and Major “Technical Improvements”)
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am by Arthur F. Coon
County of Kern (1976) 62 Cal.App.3d 761 and California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Rejects CEQA Challenges To EIR For Petaluma River Apartment Project, Upholds Special Status Species Baseline And Public Safety/Emergency Access Impacts Analyses As Supported By Substantial Evidence
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Context Matters: First District Holds CEQA Requires EIR, Not MND, To Analyze Mixed-Use Project’s Potentially Significant Aesthetic And Traffic Impacts On Fremont’s Niles Historical District
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Protect Niles v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Google Books Settlement
17 Dec 2009, 9:49 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
Above the Law - http://abovethelaw.com/
Legal Research Gone Wrong: A Cautionary Tale About Relying on ChatGPT
8 Jun 2023, 7:09 am by Cleve Clinton
Among them was Varghese v. [read post]
Tilting the Scales - http://www.tiltingthescales.com/
Third District Affirms Judgment Upholding State Lands Commission’s Supplemental EIR For Desalination Plant Lease Modification, Rejects CEQA Claims That Commission Piecemealed Review And Should Have Assumed Lead Agency Status And Prepared A Subsequent EIR
11 May 2021, 11:48 am by Arthur F. Coon
  California Coastkeeper Alliance v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Disappointment: High Court’s Narrow Opinion In SANDAG RTP/SCS EIR Case Offers Little Guidance On CEQA GHG Analysis
17 Jul 2017, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” (Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Problems with Filters in the European Commission's Platforms Proposal
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
After 16 pages exhorting platforms to “proactively detect, identify and remove illegal content” using algorithms, the report gets to a shorter, separate section on “preventing the re-appearance of illegal content. [read post]
Stanford Center for Internet and Society Blogs - http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog
Slam Dunked! First District Rejects All CEQA And Land Use Challenges To Golden State Warriors Event Center Project And EIR In Expedited Litigation
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Mission Bay Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
How can this libel verdict stand?
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Steve Lombardi
Page Keeton, Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts §? [read post]
The Iowa Edict - http://www.theiowaedict.com/
CEQA Remedies Go Both Ways:  Fourth District Reverses Judgment Upholding San Diego County Board’s Decision Granting Project Opponents’ Administrative Appeal, Holds Board Erred In Finding CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Statutory Exemption Inapplicable And Ordering EIR Prepared for Exempt Industrial Project
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
., et al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Three Reasons Copyright is Not a Monopoly
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
Author X, for example, can prohibit a third party, Y, from inscribing a certain pattern of words on Y’s own blank pages with Y’s own ink. [read post]
Copyhype - http://www.copyhype.com/
What is the Twombly Motion-to-Dismiss Standard for Antitrust Cases? Comparing the Ninth and Second Circuits
15 Aug 2020, 11:36 am by Bona Law PC
” Gelboim v. [read post]
The Antitrust Attorney Blog - http://www.theantitrustattorney.com/
Tort Law’s Sleight of Hand – Part 4
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
For example, in Triplett v. [read post]
Tortini - http://schachtmanlaw.com/blog/
Defense testimony of Jammie Thomas-Rasset
17 Jun 2009, 6:47 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
Recording Industry vs The People - http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/
Fourth District Holds Addendum To 2010 Program EIR For Irvine Business Complex Vision Plan Violated CEQA Because Conclusion That Large Infill Project’s GHG Emissions Would Be Less Than Significant Lacked Substantial Evidence And Project Was Not Exempt
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  IBC Business Owners for Sensible Development v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com