Search for: "Samuel D. Thomas" Results 181 - 200 of 649
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Julia Solomon-Strauss
Justice Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito wrote separate dissents. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
In a sweeping opinion, Justice Samuel Alito, joined by four other justices, decided that the limitations on habeas review in 8 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” Nina Totenberg reports at NPR that “[t]he vote was 7-2, but [Justice Samuel] Alito’s opinion was joined only by the court’s four other conservatives — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh[; t]wo of the court’s liberal justices — Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg –agreed that Thuraissigiam’s removal order was proper but said that the opinion’s reasoning and… [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Daniel Folsom
This past April, the Supreme Court passed up an opportunity to clarify an important question in County of Maui v. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 6:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
La opinión disidente – suscrita por los jueces Samuel Alito Jr., Clarece Thomas y Neil Gorsuch – rechazó la noción de que el Tribunal Estatal no adjudicó prejuicio bajo Strickland. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Brinna Ludwig
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted to hear the case. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm by Joshua Cossin
A dissenting opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas, who was joined by Justice Samuel Alito, argues that Congress had not empowered the courts to hear such disputes and the courts should not overreach to do so themselves. [read post]
27 May 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, who reports that “Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
Justice Samuel Alito asks whether the House could justify a subpoena for the president’s personal records as a “case study” for more general legislation. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that “[s]ome justices including conservative Justice Samuel Alito appeared concerned about the potentially broad ramifications of a ruling backing tribal authority. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:00 am by Scott J. Limmer
Decided June 27 by a 5-4 margin, the plurality decision was written by Justice Samuel Alito, and joined by Chief Justice Roberts, plus Justices Breyer and Kavanaugh; Justice Clarence Thomas separately wrote he’d favor making blood tests automatically legal whenever police had reasonable cause for a drunk-driving arrest but agreed with Alito’s holding that exigent circumstances exception almost always make a warrant unnecessary when a suspect is unconscious. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” Nina Totenberg reports at NPR that Justice Brett Kavanaugh “wrote separately to stress that while he agreed with the majority on procedural grounds, he agreed with the dissenters–Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch–on one key issue”: whether “the lower courts were using the wrong test to evaluate gun laws, a test that is far too deferential to gun regulators. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Sin embargo, Kagan no suscribió la sección III(D) de la disidente. [read post]