Search for: "Sears v. Sears" Results 181 - 200 of 908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm by admin
In Humphrey v Sears Roebuck, for example, employee Kathleen Humphrey injured her foot while moving stock. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/1NAintrggG 2018-03-06 Equustek does not get adjournment of the Google motion to vary the BC order Equustek . v Jack, 2018 BCSC 329 https://t.co/tbKXcWmykJ 2018-03-06 Equustek applies in another case to grant injunction against a non-party Aubin v Petrone, 2018 ABQB 163 https://t.co/KN8jYnITIV 2018-03-06 Sleep country gets trade mark injunction against Sears Sleep Country Canada Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1546 (Fed. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” From the Dissent “New York recognizes a distinct claim for professional malpractice and allows parties to pursue simultaneously a professional malpractice claim and a breach of contract claim (see Santulli v Englert, Reilly & McHugh, 78 NY2d 700 [1992]); Sears, Roebuck v Enco, 43 NY2d 389 [1977]; see also Robins v Finestone, 308 NY 543 [1955]). [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 9:34 am
Rare Interlocutory Injunction Granted in a Trademark Case The Federal Court rarely grants interlocutory injunctions in trademark cases, but did so in Sleep Country Canada Inc. v Sears Canada Inc. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Sears, Tommaso Tani, Simone van der Hof Global Internet Law: Ethics and the Law, Thomas H. [read post]